Politicians pushing back

Author name

“I’m sorry, but you can’t believe everything you read in the Globe and Mail.” – PM Mark Carney

We’re now used to watching U.S. President Donald Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt get into verbal sparring matches with members of the media, but she’s not alone. The recent Canadian election campaign highlighted how politicians of different political stripes are also pushing back and standing up to reporting they think is offside, or questions they think are unfair.


Prime Minister Mark Carney went on the offensive against a Globe and Mail article alleging he met with a “pro-Beijing” group by responding at a news conference that “I’m sorry, but you can’t believe everything you read in the Globe and Mail.” He firmly provided his position and context, as well as stood behind one of his candidates who was also linked to the topic. He also told a Globe reporter to “check your sources before you write things like that.”


Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre already had a long-standing reputation for his style of engaging with reporters, including the famous apple eating example. But, Carney has shown more than once that he too has no fear in pushing back. In another example, a reporter tried to nail down a yes/no answer from him by saying “I’ll take that as a no then?” With Carney responding, “No, you’ll take that as a very comprehensive answer to your question.” (scroll to the end of the linked video)


🔵 The Takeaway

In media training we discuss how interviewees must clearly and firmly respond to things they disagree with or are not true – this includes any unchecked assertions or assumptions. This is particularly important in today’s environment where false narratives can take hold and situations can quicky get out of control.


At the same time, you’ve got to keep your cool and always take the high road. While digs and jabs might feel good and help you feel like you’re getting your point across, you need to be aware that three things might happen – the dig won’t make it to air, if it does there’s a risk you’ll look unfavourable, or it might tick off a sensitive reporter or publication that you have to deal with down the road.


By Michael Melling • September 15, 2026
Leadership styles | Michael O'Leary | Tim Cook | Michael Melling | StratOak
By Michael Melling • September 15, 2026
Two new reports highlight the latest Canadian media trust scores Two recent reports paint different pictures of the level of trust Canadians place in the news media. Pollara’s 4 th annual “Trust in Media” study says 51% of Canadians tend to trust the media, which is higher than the previous years they’ve done the study – 44% in 2002 and 47% in 1992. Trust levels are highest among seniors, as well as Liberal and NDP voters. Compare this to the 2026 Reuters Institute’s research report that finds only 37% of Canadians have trust in the news overall compared to 55% in 2016. It also found that just 12% of Canadians pay for news online, and that social media and news websites have overtaken traditional news sources. So, what does this mean for your organization? It’s about ensuring you’re trusted, even if the platform you find yourself on isn’t. Talk about trust in media is nothing new, and it’s clear that levels of trust vary depending on the audience. It’s about coaching your leaders to go beyond message control, and to communicate with credibility in a potentially low-trust environment. This means being comfortable and confident in explaining evidence in plain language, acknowledging uncertainty, clearly distinguishing facts from narratives, and correcting misleading assertions while engaging legitimate criticism. Success is more than positive media coverage or message consistency – it’s about creating long-term trust and confidence in your organization, and supporting your leaders and spokespeople in building it.
By Michael Melling • July 6, 2026
Common issues ahead of important communication opportunities:  1. You don’t have a clear key message If someone asks you: “What’s the one thing you want listeners to remember?” and you can’t answer in 15-30 seconds, you’re not ready. 2. You’ve memorized talking points, but can’t explain them naturally If you’re focused on memorizing scripts and key phrases, you’re more likely to struggle if you forget or get taken off track. You need the confidence to trust yourself in the conversation. 3. You don’t have a strategy for responding to tough questions If you’re planning to wing it, that’s a problem. You need to anticipate the tough questions and practice bridging to your key message – naturally and authentically. Strategy and structure are key building blocks of confidence going into any important communication opportunity. You must know the point you want to get across, know how to keep on track, and have the confidence to respond authentically in the moment.